The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and Implementation of a Computerized Decision Support System for Screening Hypertension and Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Region
|
---|---|
Published in |
"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences", January 2024
|
DOI | 10.36660/ijcs.20230085 |
Authors |
Laura Defensor Ribeiro de Melo, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, João Antonio de Queiroz Oliveira, Junia Xavier Maia, Thábata Queiroz Vivas de Sá, Vânia Soares de Oliveira e Almeida Pinto, Marcia Maria Oliveira Lima, Patrick Wander Enlich, Leonardo Bonisson Ribeiro, Christiane Correa Rodrigues Cimini, Milena Soriano Marcolino |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,478,572
of 26,542,140 outputs
Outputs from "International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences"
#22
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,686
of 387,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from "International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences"
#4
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,542,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.