The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long-term use of rituximab increases T cell count in MS patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1412668 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gunnar Sigfús Björnsson, Hildur Sigurgrímsdóttir, Sólrún Melkorka Maggadóttir, Berglind Ósk Einarsdóttir, Ólafur Árni Sveinsson, Haukur Hjaltason, Sigurveig Þóra Sigurðardóttir, Björn Rúnar Lúðvíksson, Siggeir Fannar Brynjólfsson |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 67% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,657,766
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,422
of 33,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,995
of 257,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#55
of 720 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 720 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.