The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Case Report: Focal cryoablation vs. radiofrequency ablation in a pediatric patient with para-Hisian accessory pathway with effect from the non-coronary aortic cusp
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2024.1405104 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhandos Maksut, Raushan Zhanbolatkyzy, Abay Bakytzhanuly, Almira Bajgalkanova, Yakup Ergül, Omirbek Nuralinov |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2024.
All research outputs
#18,113,962
of 26,499,616 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3,443
of 8,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,876
of 125,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#14
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,499,616 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.