The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Molecular prevalence, subtype distribution, and zoonotic potential of Blastocystis sp. in wild rodents and shrews inhabiting Zhejiang province of China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1427490 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jiayan Wang, Yiqing Wang, Wenwen Huang, Ting Zhang, Kuai Yu, Jiani Chen, Liyuting Zhou, Wenjie Cao, Junchen Xu, Jianshe Ma, Huicong Huang, Wei Zhao |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2024.
All research outputs
#6,564,706
of 26,501,765 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,126
of 8,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,137
of 291,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#10
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,501,765 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.