The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Neurobiological Basis of the Conundrum of Self-continuity: A Hypothesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.740542 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Morteza Izadifar |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 3 | 23% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#6,963,975
of 26,501,765 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,987
of 35,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,354
of 450,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#283
of 1,920 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,501,765 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,920 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.