The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
New devices, new problems. Pneumomediastinum secondary to therapy with Renuvion/J-Plasma®. Case report
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología (Wolters Kluwer), June 2024
|
DOI | 10.5554/22562087.e1115 |
Authors |
Álvaro Andrés Montenegro, Carlos Andrés Bermúdez, Tatiana Pabón Henao, Sebastián Torres Zúñiga, Lina María Triana |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,285,918
of 26,519,936 outputs
Outputs from Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología (Wolters Kluwer)
#31
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,167
of 318,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología (Wolters Kluwer)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,519,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them