The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Trypanosoma spp. infection in bats captured in urban and wild ecotopes of the Caribbean region in Colombia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.17843/rpmesp.2024.412.13598 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Iván Benavides-Céspedes, Marlon Mauricio Ardila, Geovanny Jiménez-Cotes, Luis Avendaño-Maldonado, Daisy Lozano-Arias, Roberto Garcia-Alzate, Leidi Herrera |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,605,138
of 26,519,936 outputs
Outputs from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#290
of 480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,568
of 309,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,519,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 480 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.