The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Pushing the Frontiers of nutritional Life Cycle Assessment (nLCA) to identify globally equitable and sustainable agri-food systems
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1471102 |
Authors |
Graham A. McAuliffe, Ty Beal, Michael R. F. Lee, Jolieke C. van der Pols |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2024.
All research outputs
#7,249,636
of 26,548,096 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
#612
of 3,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,920
of 135,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
#5
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,548,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.