↓ Skip to main content

Fibrin drives thromboinflammation and neuropathology in COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4379 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
4 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fibrin drives thromboinflammation and neuropathology in COVID-19
Published in
Nature, August 2024
DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07873-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae Kyu Ryu, Zhaoqi Yan, Mauricio Montano, Elif G. Sozmen, Karuna Dixit, Rahul K. Suryawanshi, Yusuke Matsui, Ekram Helmy, Prashant Kaushal, Sara K. Makanani, Thomas J. Deerinck, Anke Meyer-Franke, Pamela E. Rios Coronado, Troy N. Trevino, Min-Gyoung Shin, Reshmi Tognatta, Yixin Liu, Renaud Schuck, Lucas Le, Hisao Miyajima, Andrew S. Mendiola, Nikhita Arun, Brandon Guo, Taha Y. Taha, Ayushi Agrawal, Eilidh MacDonald, Oliver Aries, Aaron Yan, Olivia Weaver, Mark A. Petersen, Rosa Meza Acevedo, Maria del Pilar S. Alzamora, Reuben Thomas, Michela Traglia, Valentina L. Kouznetsova, Igor F. Tsigelny, Alexander R. Pico, Kristy Red-Horse, Mark H. Ellisman, Nevan J. Krogan, Mehdi Bouhaddou, Melanie Ott, Warner C. Greene, Katerina Akassoglou

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,379 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 44%
Unspecified 3 17%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Philosophy 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2059. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2024.
All research outputs
#4,695
of 26,646,559 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#482
of 101,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40
of 225,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#5
of 884 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,646,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 884 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.