The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A transporter’s doom or destiny: SLC6A1 in health and disease, novel molecular targets and emerging therapeutic prospects
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1466694 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nikita Shah, Ameya S. Kasture, Florian P. Fischer, Harald H. Sitte, Thomas Hummel, Sonja Sucic |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Scientists | 4 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2024.
All research outputs
#5,124,260
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#788
of 3,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,520
of 140,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.