The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Effect of Drying Boreal Lakes on Plants, Soils, and Microbial Communities in Lake Margin Habitats
|
---|---|
Published in |
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1029/2023jg007819 |
Authors |
Vijay P. Patil, Jack W. McFarland, Kimberly P. Wickland, Kristen Manies, Mark Winterstein, Teresa N. Hollingsworth, Eugénie S. Euskirchen, Mark P. Waldrop |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,033,679
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES
#731
of 1,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,052
of 168,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.