↓ Skip to main content

iCount: a human-factors engineered solution to vaginal swab retention – an early-stage innovation report

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Innovations, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
iCount: a human-factors engineered solution to vaginal swab retention – an early-stage innovation report
Published in
BMJ Innovations, August 2024
DOI 10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001248
Authors

Ahmed Nader Elgharably, Kiran Desai, Alan Michael Nevill, Aaron Vance, Jon Lester, Emma Bonfiglio, Colin Rigby, Andrew Forrester, Peter Ogrodnik, Jeffrey Faint, Tom Clutton-Brock, Aditi Desai

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,632,239
of 26,557,556 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Innovations
#259
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,571
of 136,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Innovations
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,556 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.