The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Different Teams, Same Conclusions? A Systematic Review of Existing Clinical Guidelines for the Assessment and Treatment of Tinnitus in Adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00206 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas E. Fuller, Haula F. Haider, Dimitris Kikidis, Alec Lapira, Birgit Mazurek, Arnaud Norena, Sarah Rabau, Rachelle Lardinois, Christopher R. Cederroth, Niklas K. Edvall, Petra G. Brueggemann, Susanne N. Rosing, Anestis Kapandais, Dorte Lungaard, Derek J. Hoare, Rilana F. F Cima |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 45% |
Switzerland | 4 | 13% |
Italy | 2 | 6% |
Germany | 2 | 6% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 81% |
Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 142 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 17% |
Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 16% |
Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 14% |
Neuroscience | 13 | 9% |
Psychology | 9 | 6% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Unknown | 49 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2018.
All research outputs
#904,105
of 26,368,346 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,915
of 35,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,955
of 328,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#46
of 488 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,368,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 488 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.