The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Accuracy and role of consumer facing wearable technology for continuous monitoring during endoscopic procedures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Digital Health, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1422929 |
Authors |
Jad P. AbiMansour, Jyotroop Kaur, Saran Velaga, Priyanka Vatsavayi, Matthew Vogt, Vinay Chandrasekhara |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#8,733,064
of 26,582,041 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Digital Health
#350
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,530
of 138,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Digital Health
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,582,041 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.