↓ Skip to main content

Using time-to-contact information to assess potential collision modulates both visual and temporal prediction networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using time-to-contact information to assess potential collision modulates both visual and temporal prediction networks
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2008
DOI 10.3389/neuro.09.010.2008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer T Coull, Franck Vidal, Ceydric Goulon, Bruno Nazarian, Cathy Craig

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 2%
United States 2 2%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 90 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 38%
Neuroscience 13 13%
Engineering 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,329
of 7,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,172
of 98,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.