The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The influence of recipe disaggregation in dietary assessment: results from the national food consumption survey in Saint Kitts and Nevis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1404932 |
Authors |
Sandra Patricia Crispim, Vanessa Cardozo Mendes Elias, Latoya Matthew-Duncan, Isabella Francis-Grandeson, Fransen Jean, Victoria Padula de Quadros, Agnieszka Balcerzak, Rita Ferreira de Sousa, Ariel de Moraes Frauches, Claudia Choma Bettega Almeida, Sharon D. Hutchinson, U. Ruth Charrondière, Bridget Anna Holmes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2024.
All research outputs
#18,167,671
of 26,577,771 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,971
of 7,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,079
of 134,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#61
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,577,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.