The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
GWAS of resistance to three bacterial diseases in the Andean common bean diversity panel
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1469381 |
Authors |
Alvaro Soler-Garzón, Mwiinga Mulube, Kelvin Kamfwa, Davies M. Lungu, Swivia Hamabwe, Jayanta Roy, Venâncio Salegua, Deidré Fourie, Timothy G. Porch, Phillip E. McClean, Phillip N. Miklas |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#15,253,992
of 26,582,041 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,664
of 25,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,995
of 137,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#23
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,582,041 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.