The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genetic prediction of blood metabolites mediating the relationship between gut microbiota and Alzheimer’s disease: a Mendelian randomization study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1414977 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guanglei Chen, Yaxian Jin, Cancan Chu, Yuhao Zheng, Yunzhi Chen, Xing Zhu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#5,137,433
of 26,583,927 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,996
of 30,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,067
of 184,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,583,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.