Michael S. Bloom, Juliana M. Clark, John L. Pearce, Pamela L. Ferguson, Roger B. Newman, James R. Roberts, William A. Grobman, Anthony C. Sciscione, Daniel W. Skupski, Kelly Garcia, John E. Vena, Kelly J. Hunt, the ECHO-FGS study group
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
50%
Medicine and Dentistry
1
50%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2024.
All research outputs
#418,892
of 26,625,282 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health Perspectives
#434
of 9,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,759
of 162,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health Perspectives
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,625,282 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
