The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ovarian carcinosarcomas: p53 status defines two distinct patterns of oncogenesis and outcomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2024.1408196 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gurdial Dhillon, Marta Llaurado-Fernandez, Basile Tessier-Cloutier, Keiyan Sy, Dina Bassiouny, Guangming Han, Nelson K. Y. Wong, Kathryn McRae, Mary Kinloch, Jennifer Pors, Laura Hopkins, Allan Covens, Martin Köbel, Cheng-Han Lee, Mark S. Carey |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#3,635,947
of 26,609,881 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,176
of 23,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,450
of 208,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#3
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,609,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.