The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bursting gamma oscillations in neural mass models
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fncom.2024.1422159 |
Authors |
Manoj Kumar Nandi, Michele Valla, Matteo di Volo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 80% |
Scientists | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2024.
All research outputs
#3,483,576
of 26,626,905 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#144
of 1,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,380
of 179,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,905 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.