Title |
Is Elite Sport (Really) Bad for You? Can We Answer the Question?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00324 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Florence Lebrun, Dave Collins |
Abstract |
Elite athletes are not immune to mental health issues. Yet, quality research on mental health in elites has so far been limited. Thus, while research on mental health emphasises the prevalence and nature of disorders in the general population, its extent in elite performers remains unclear. Indeed, the prevalence of mental conditions cannot be accurately calculated in elite athletes due to a lack of diagnostic criteria and screening tools specifically adapted to this unique population. Researchers and practitioners are, therefore, confronted with biases reflecting the use of clinical norms and instruments initially developed for the general population. Furthermore, without considering the athlete persona as well as the sport culture in which elites play, there is a risk of under- or over-estimating the prevalence of mental health issues in high-performance environments. Due to the unique characteristics surrounding an elite athlete's life, we therefore suggest a change of perspective: moving from the usual normal-versus-pathological to a functional-versus-dysfunctional approach. Implications for future research and practice are discussed, most notably examining practitioners' expertise in diagnosing and treating elite performers. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 12 | 39% |
United States | 4 | 13% |
Ireland | 3 | 10% |
Slovakia | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
Scientists | 8 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 102 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 20% |
Unknown | 30 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 25 | 24% |
Sports and Recreations | 21 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 32 | 31% |