The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Successful citizen science tools to monitor animal populations require innovation and communication: SealSpotter as a case study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2024.1412510 |
Authors |
Peter S. Puskic, Ross Holmberg, Rebecca R. McIntosh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 83% |
Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#7,450,370
of 26,609,881 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#198
of 445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,158
of 149,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,609,881 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them