The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fast and quantitative mitophagy assessment by flow cytometry using the mito-QC reporter
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2024.1460061 |
Authors |
Juan Ignacio Jiménez-Loygorri, Carlos Jiménez-García, Álvaro Viedma-Poyatos, Patricia Boya |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 7 | 58% |
Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#5,644,650
of 26,616,237 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#1,383
of 10,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,241
of 135,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#6
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,616,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.