The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Racial disparities in TAVR outcomes in patients with cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1416092 |
Authors |
Ethan D. Kotloff, Yash Desai, Rohan Desai, Christopher Messner, Sergey Gnilopyat, Mark Sonbol, Abdullah Aljudaibi, Ai Tarui, Juwan Ives, Nisarg Shah, Ishan Vaish, Diljon Chahal, Brian Barr, Manu Mysore |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2024.
All research outputs
#8,912,603
of 26,607,108 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,695
of 9,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,704
of 131,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#6
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,607,108 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.