The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An integrative paradigm for building causal knowledge
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecological Monographs, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/ecm.1628 |
Authors |
James B. Grace |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 5 | 22% |
United States | 3 | 13% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
El Salvador | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
Scientists | 5 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2024.
All research outputs
#3,235,396
of 26,801,235 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#262
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,727
of 275,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,801,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.