↓ Skip to main content

Minimum intraoperative testing battery for cochlear implantation: the international practice trend

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimum intraoperative testing battery for cochlear implantation: the international practice trend
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, September 2024
DOI 10.1007/s00405-024-08944-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isra Aljazeeri, Yassin Abdelsamad, Abdulrahman Alsanosi, Abdulrahman Hagr, Ana H. Kim, Angel Ramos-Macias, Angel Ramos de Miguel, Anja Kurz, Artur Lorens, Bruce Gantz, Craig A. Buchman, Dayse Távora-Vieira, Georg Sprinzl, Griet Mertens, James E. Saunders, Julie Kosaner, Laila M. Telmesani, Luis Lassaletta, Manohar Bance, Medhat Yousef, Meredith A. Holcomb, Oliver Adunka, Per Cayé-Thomasen, Piotr Henryk Skarzynski, Ranjith Rajeswaran, Robert J. Briggs, Seung-Ha Oh, Stefan K. Plontke, Stephen J. O’Leary, Sumit Agrawal, Tatsuya Yamasoba, Thomas Lenarz, Thomas Wesarg, Walter Kutz, Patrick Connolly, Ilona Anderson, Farid Alzhrani

Abstract

In cochlear implantation (CI) surgery, there are a wide variety of intraoperative tests available. However, no clear guide exists on which tests must be performed as the minimum intraoperative testing battery. Toward this end, we studied the usage patterns, recommendations, and attitudes of practitioners toward intraoperative testing. This study is a multicentric international survey of tertiary referral CI centers. A survey was developed and administered to a group of CI practitioners (n = 34) including otologists, audiologists and biomedical engineers. Thirty six participants were invited to participate in this study based on a their scientific outputs to the literature on the intraoperative testing in CI field and based on their high load of CI surgeries. Thirty four, from 15 countries have accepted the invitation to participate. The participants were asked to indicate the usage trends, perceived value, influence on decision making and duration of each intraoperative test. They were also asked to indicate which tests they believe should be included in a minimum test battery for routine cases. Thirty-two (94%) experts provided responses. The most frequently recommended tests for a minimum battery were facial nerve monitoring, electrode impedance measurements, and measurements of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs). The perceived value and influence on surgical decision-making also varied, with high-resolution CT being rated the highest on both measures. Facial nerve monitoring, electrode impedance measurements, and ECAP measurements are currently the core tests of the intraoperative test battery for CI surgery.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2024.
All research outputs
#4,772,724
of 26,460,266 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#227
of 3,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,307
of 138,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,460,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.