The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Use of Water Sac Dilation in Resecting Parapharyngeal Space Benign Tumor via Transoral Approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Laryngoscope, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/lary.31772 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuke Dong, Junbo Zhang, Yujie Li, Wei Huang, Yanwei Dang, Tao Li, Lianfang Xu, Xiao Shen, Hongyan Li, Lijie Huang, Beiying Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nigeria | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2024.
All research outputs
#16,745,063
of 26,571,932 outputs
Outputs from The Laryngoscope
#3,376
of 7,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,856
of 152,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Laryngoscope
#7
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,932 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.