↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of epidemiological modelling in response to lumpy skin disease outbreaks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of epidemiological modelling in response to lumpy skin disease outbreaks
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2024
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2024.1459293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simin Lee, Christopher M. Baker, Emily Sellens, Mark A. Stevenson, Sharon Roche, Robyn N. Hall, Andrew C. Breed, Simon M. Firestone

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2024.
All research outputs
#17,544,037
of 26,587,829 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,814
of 8,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,463
of 135,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#14
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,587,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.