The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Root resource foraging: does it matter?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2013.00303 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xin Tian, Peter Doerner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 25% |
Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 29% |
Researcher | 13 | 21% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 54% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,236,232
of 26,454,856 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,660
of 25,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,285
of 294,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#111
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,454,856 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.