The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Separation of mycolic acid isomers by cyclic ion mobility‐mass spectrometry
|
---|---|
Published in |
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/rcm.9917 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hector de las Heras Prieto, Laura M. Cole, Sarah Forbes, Martin Palmer, Rachel Schwartz‐Narbonne |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 50% |
Germany | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2024.
All research outputs
#16,470,489
of 26,544,284 outputs
Outputs from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#2,980
of 5,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,012
of 132,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.