The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Magnetic detection of anthropogenic fires at Xiaodong Rockshelter, Southwest China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, November 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jas.2024.106086 |
Authors |
Yan Zheng, Qing Yang, Quan Zeng, Haiyan Li, Yu Zhang, Lin Shi, Xueping Ji, Chenglong Deng, Xiaoqiang Li, Michael Petraglia, Hongbo Zheng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 4 | 9% |
United States | 4 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
India | 2 | 4% |
Germany | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Thailand | 1 | 2% |
Poland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 22 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 70% |
Scientists | 13 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,766,137
of 26,639,477 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#429
of 3,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,852
of 31,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,639,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.