The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Why do Eurasian otters eat so few invasive blue crabs?
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10344-024-01853-9 |
Authors |
Sergio Bedmar, Francisco J. Oficialdegui, Miguel Clavero |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 15 | 37% |
Germany | 2 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Czechia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 78% |
Scientists | 8 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,605,434
of 26,740,027 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#72
of 1,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,742
of 153,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,740,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.