Tobias van Elst, Gabriele M. Sgarlata, Dominik Schüßler, George P. Tiley, Jelmer W. Poelstra, Marina Scheumann, Marina B. Blanco, Isa G. Aleixo-Pais, Mamy Rina Evasoa, Jörg U. Ganzhorn, Steven M. Goodman, Alida F. Hasiniaina, Daniel Hending, Paul A. Hohenlohe, Mohamed T. Ibouroi, Amaia Iribar, Fabien Jan, Peter M. Kappeler, Barbara Le Pors, Sophie Manzi, Gillian Olivieri, Ando N. Rakotonanahary, S. Jacques Rakotondranary, Romule Rakotondravony, José M. Ralison, J. Freddy Ranaivoarisoa, Blanchard Randrianambinina, Rodin M. Rasoloarison, Solofonirina Rasoloharijaona, Emmanuel Rasolondraibe, Helena Teixeira, John R. Zaonarivelo, Edward E. Louis, Anne D. Yoder, Lounès Chikhi, Ute Radespiel, Jordi Salmona
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,444,366
of 26,724,005 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#1,547
of 2,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,138
of 142,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#18
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,724,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 152.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
