The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of the lithium resource in the Smackover Formation brines of southern Arkansas using machine learning
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science Advances, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.adp8149 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katherine J. Knierim, Madalyn S. Blondes, Andrew Masterson, Philip Freeman, Bonnie McDevitt, Amanda Herzberg, Peng Li, Ciara Mills, Colin Doolan, Aaron M. Jubb, Scott M. Ausbrooks, Jessica Chenault |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2024.
All research outputs
#23,930,187
of 26,646,559 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#13,089
of 13,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,981
of 132,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#258
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,646,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 117.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.