↓ Skip to main content

Biobanking, digital health and privacy: the choices of 1410 volunteers and neurological patients regarding limitations on use of data and biological samples, return of results and sharing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biobanking, digital health and privacy: the choices of 1410 volunteers and neurological patients regarding limitations on use of data and biological samples, return of results and sharing
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, September 2024
DOI 10.1186/s12910-024-01102-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilia Giannella, Josep Miquel Bauça, Simona Gabriella Di Santo, Stefano Brunelli, Elisabetta Costa, Sergio Di Fonzo, Francesca Romana Fusco, Antonio Perre, Valerio Pisani, Giorgia Presicce, Francesca Spanedda, Giorgio Scivoletto, Rita Formisano, Maria Grazia Grasso, Stefano Paolucci, Domenico De Angelis, Giulia Sancesario

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2024.
All research outputs
#7,011,410
of 26,690,210 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#573
of 1,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,850
of 137,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,690,210 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them