↓ Skip to main content

New approach methodologies (NAMs) for the in vitro assessment of cleaning products for respiratory irritation: workshop report

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Toxicology, October 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New approach methodologies (NAMs) for the in vitro assessment of cleaning products for respiratory irritation: workshop report
Published in
Frontiers in Toxicology, October 2024
DOI 10.3389/ftox.2024.1431790
Authors

Lynne T. Haber, Mark A. Bradley, Amanda N. Buerger, Holger Behrsing, Sabina Burla, Phillip W. Clapp, Scott Dotson, Casey Fisher, Keith R. Genco, Francis H. Kruszewski, Shaun D. McCullough, Kathryn E. Page, Vivek Patel, Nathan Pechacek, Clive Roper, Monita Sharma, Annie M. Jarabek

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2024.
All research outputs
#16,927,353
of 26,744,542 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Toxicology
#139
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,076
of 129,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Toxicology
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,744,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.