The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Epigenetic changes driven by environmental pollutants in lung carcinogenesis: a comprehensive review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420933 |
Authors |
Aijia Zhang, Xuexing Luo, Yu Li, Lunchun Yan, Xin Lai, Qianxu Yang, Ziming Zhao, Guanghui Huang, Zheng Li, Qibiao Wu, Jue Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2024.
All research outputs
#24,030,724
of 26,746,546 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#10,777
of 15,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,552
of 130,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#67
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,746,546 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.