↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Dynamics of Asia’s and Australasia’s forests in a changing world

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, October 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Dynamics of Asia’s and Australasia’s forests in a changing world
Published in
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, October 2024
DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2024.1474882
Authors

Nophea Sasaki, Ling Zhang, John Meadows, Jeong-Wook Seo, Hans Juergen Boehmer

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2024.
All research outputs
#16,989,321
of 26,745,262 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#547
of 1,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,685
of 132,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,745,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.