↓ Skip to main content

Supplementary motor area is deactivated during mental rotation tasks with biomechanical constraints in fMRI

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supplementary motor area is deactivated during mental rotation tasks with biomechanical constraints in fMRI
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1455587
Authors

Makoto Nomura, Michihiko Koeda, Yumiko Ikeda, Amane Tateno, Ryosuke Arakawa, Yoichiro Aoyagi

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2024.
All research outputs
#21,789,173
of 26,749,913 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,585
of 7,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,286
of 134,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,749,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.