↓ Skip to main content

Water ecological health evaluation of urban river: a case study of Zaogang River, China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, October 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Water ecological health evaluation of urban river: a case study of Zaogang River, China
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, October 2024
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2024.1478024
Authors

Jiaqi Zhang, Jiaqi Xiang, Qiwen Ma, Chunhui Li, Xiangen Xu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2024.
All research outputs
#18,324,870
of 26,789,368 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3,313
of 5,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,331
of 146,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,789,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.