The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of violet LED with or without a bleaching gel: a 12-month randomized clinical trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Dental Medicine, October 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1427301 |
Authors |
Ana Cristina Távora de Albuquerque Lopes, Nair Cristina Margarido Brondino, Juliana Fraga Soares Bombonatti, Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2024.
All research outputs
#21,821,049
of 26,792,839 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Dental Medicine
#112
of 299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,485
of 129,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Dental Medicine
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,792,839 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them