↓ Skip to main content

A robust family of Golden Gate Agrobacterium vectors for plant synthetic biology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A robust family of Golden Gate Agrobacterium vectors for plant synthetic biology
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shahram Emami, Muh-ching Yee, José R. Dinneny

Abstract

Tools that allow for rapid, accurate and inexpensive assembly of multi-component combinatorial libraries of DNA for transformation into plants will accelerate the progress of synthetic biology research. Recent innovations in molecular cloning methods has vastly expanded the repertoire with which plant biologists can engineer a transgene. Here we describe a new set of binary vectors for use in Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation that utilizes the Golden-Gate Cloning approach. Our optimized protocol facilitates the rapid and inexpensive generation of multi-component transgenes for later introduction into plants.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 135 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 23%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 22%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,933,120
of 24,701,594 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,360
of 23,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,167
of 291,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#25
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,532 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.