The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Low‐level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss
|
---|---|
Published in |
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/lsm.22170 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pinar Avci, Gaurav K. Gupta, Jason Clark, Norbert Wikonkal, Michael R. Hamblin |
Abstract |
Alopecia is a common disorder affecting more than half of the population worldwide. Androgenetic alopecia, the most common type, affects 50% of males over the age of 40 and 75% of females over 65. Only two drugs have been approved so far (minoxidil and finasteride) and hair transplant is the other treatment alternative. This review surveys the evidence for low-level laser therapy (LLLT) applied to the scalp as a treatment for hair loss and discusses possible mechanisms of actions. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 17% |
Canada | 2 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
China | 1 | 4% |
Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 91% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 301 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 55 | 18% |
Researcher | 31 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 7% |
Other | 19 | 6% |
Other | 61 | 20% |
Unknown | 91 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 29% |
Engineering | 16 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 3% |
Other | 56 | 19% |
Unknown | 103 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#202,822
of 26,370,058 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
#7
of 1,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,293
of 212,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.