↓ Skip to main content

Low‐level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss

Overview of attention for article published in Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 1,720)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
twitter
23 X users
patent
14 patents
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
7 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
Title
Low‐level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss
Published in
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/lsm.22170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pinar Avci, Gaurav K. Gupta, Jason Clark, Norbert Wikonkal, Michael R. Hamblin

Abstract

Alopecia is a common disorder affecting more than half of the population worldwide. Androgenetic alopecia, the most common type, affects 50% of males over the age of 40 and 75% of females over 65. Only two drugs have been approved so far (minoxidil and finasteride) and hair transplant is the other treatment alternative. This review surveys the evidence for low-level laser therapy (LLLT) applied to the scalp as a treatment for hair loss and discusses possible mechanisms of actions.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 301 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 18%
Researcher 31 10%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Other 19 6%
Other 61 20%
Unknown 91 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 29%
Engineering 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 103 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#202,822
of 26,370,058 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
#7
of 1,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,293
of 212,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.