↓ Skip to main content

Nitric oxide implication in the control of seed dormancy and germination

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nitric oxide implication in the control of seed dormancy and germination
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00346
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erwann Arc, Marc Galland, Béatrice Godin, Gwendal Cueff, Loïc Rajjou

Abstract

Germination ability is regulated by a combination of environmental and endogenous signals with both synergistic and antagonistic effects. Nitric oxide (NO) is a potent dormancy-releasing agent in many species, including Arabidopsis, and has been suggested to behave as an endogenous regulator of this physiological blockage. Distinct reports have also highlighted a positive impact of NO on seed germination under sub-optimal conditions. However, its molecular mode of action in the context of seed biology remains poorly documented. This review aims to focus on the implications of this radical in the control of seed dormancy and germination. The consequences of NO chemistry on the investigations on both its signaling and its targets in seeds are discussed. NO-dependent protein post-translational modifications are proposed as a key mechanism underlying NO signaling during early seed germination.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 42 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 11%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Unspecified 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 42 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,052,668
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,520
of 19,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,842
of 280,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#33
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.