The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prognostic and predictive factors of canine tumours defined with immunohistochemistry's assistance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência Rural, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0103-84782012000600013 |
Authors |
Rodrigo dos Santos Horta, Mariana de Pádua Costa, Gleidice Eunice Lavalle, Roberto Baracat de Araújo, Geovanni Dantas Cassali |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 81% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 81% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,057
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,704
of 177,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.