↓ Skip to main content

Review on Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation and Music: Implications for Emotion Dysregulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review on Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation and Music: Implications for Emotion Dysregulation
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiancheng Hou, Bei Song, Andrew C. N. Chen, Changan Sun, Jiaxian Zhou, Haidong Zhu, Theodore P. Beauchaine

Abstract

Previous studies have examined the neural correlates of emotion regulation and the neural changes that are evoked by music exposure. However, the link between music and emotion regulation is poorly understood. The objectives of this review are to (1) synthesize what is known about the neural correlates of emotion regulation and music-evoked emotions, and (2) consider the possibility of therapeutic effects of music on emotion dysregulation. Music-evoked emotions can modulate activities in both cortical and subcortical systems, and across cortical-subcortical networks. Functions within these networks are integral to generation and regulation of emotions. Since dysfunction in these networks are observed in numerous psychiatric disorders, a better understanding of neural correlates of music exposure may lead to more systematic and effective use of music therapy in emotion dysregulation.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 199 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Student > Master 23 12%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 55 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 31%
Neuroscience 21 11%
Arts and Humanities 10 5%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 65 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,756,421
of 24,878,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,158
of 33,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,746
of 314,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#277
of 557 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,878,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 557 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.