↓ Skip to main content

The spliced leader trans-splicing mechanism in different organisms: molecular details and possible biological roles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The spliced leader trans-splicing mechanism in different organisms: molecular details and possible biological roles
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2013.00199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mainá Bitar, Mariana Boroni, Andréa M. Macedo, Carlos R. Machado, Glória R. Franco

Abstract

THE SPLICED LEADER (SL) IS A GENE THAT GENERATES A FUNCTIONAL NCRNA THAT IS COMPOSED OF TWO REGIONS: an intronic region of unknown function (SLi) and an exonic region (SLe), which is transferred to the 5' end of independent transcripts yielding mature mRNAs, in a process known as spliced leader trans-splicing (SLTS). The best described function for SLTS is to solve polycistronic transcripts into monocistronic units, specifically in Trypanosomatids. In other metazoans, it is speculated that the SLe addition could lead to increased mRNA stability, differential recruitment of the translational machinery, modification of the 5' region or a combination of these effects. Although important aspects of this mechanism have been revealed, several features remain to be elucidated. We have analyzed 157 SLe sequences from 148 species from seven phyla and found a high degree of conservation among the sequences of species from the same phylum, although no considerable similarity seems to exist between sequences of species from different phyla. When analyzing case studies, we found evidence that a given SLe will always be related to a given set of transcripts in different species from the same phylum, and therefore, different SLe sequences from the same species would regulate different sets of transcripts. In addition, we have observed distinct transcript categories to be preferential targets for the SLe addition in different phyla. This work sheds light into crucial and controversial aspects of the SLTS mechanism. It represents a comprehensive study concerning various species and different characteristics of this important post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Taiwan 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 33%
Unspecified 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,699,064
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#6,034
of 11,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,216
of 280,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#219
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,757 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.