The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Synthesis of Chiral Sulfoxides by Metal-Catalyzed Oxidation with t-Butyl Hydroperoxide
|
---|---|
Published in |
Synthesis, January 1984
|
DOI | 10.1055/s-1984-30829 |
Authors |
Fulvio Di Furia*, Giorgio Modena, Roberta Seraglia |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 21 | 62% |
Energy | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2013.
All research outputs
#2,928,300
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Synthesis
#141
of 4,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,050
of 35,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthesis
#5
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,613 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.